3 ms·
I suggest it's the other way around. They know, at least as far as publicity is concerned, they are the most likely person to be replaced with AI. They're a
by akira2501 3y ago
I suggest it's the other way around.
They know, at least as far as publicity is concerned, they are the most likely person to be replaced with AI. They're a constant liability and their human qualities make the most unsuited towards their own jobs.
- SrslyJosh 3y agoBut they're at the top of the hierarchy, so I don't think they're actually in danger of being replaced. I do think it would be incredibly entertaining to see if people could tell a difference; I just don't think anyone is going to force them out any time soon.
- nessbot 3y agoWouldn't the the shareholders be the top of the hierarchy? (Granted, in a lot of cases, there's overlap.)
- CTmystery 3y agoThat's interesting. I've come to view execs and "leadership teams" as having a parasitic function on an otherwise vibrant host. It will be interesting to see if AI takes out the top instead of the bottom. My money is still on the bottom.
- carpet_wheel 3y agoGet an answer the execs don't like? Time to retrain! Could be AI or human resources, it doesn't matter.