3 ms·
You still need someone with balls to be plaintiff and someone with money to fund the suit. It reeks of a constructed case, it's not the usual case of a hunter g
by HarryHirsch 3y ago
You still need someone with balls to be plaintiff and someone with money to fund the suit. It reeks of a constructed case, it's not the usual case of a hunter getting run off by private security or someone given the runaround by the sheriff, who knows whose side he is supposed to be on.
- nine_k 3y agoMaybe because it is, I bet they more than once were miffed about the whole idea if the infinitely small point of contact between two checkerboard plots preventing them to pass from one parcel of public land to another, which is technically at zero distance from the first. I suppose they wanted to make a case to demonstrate the dubiousness of that norm, and successfully have made one. Kudos to them.
- jethro_tell 3y agoThe article says the defense was funded by local hunters, fishermen and their organizations via a fundraiser.