> that would be very misleading and dangerous for software engineers at a company who may inadvertently use your code at their job in a professional manner and

> that would be very misleading and dangerous for software engineers at a company who may inadvertently use your code at their job in a professional manner and then get their employer sued for violating the terms of the license So there's another point of confusion/disagreement. I don't recall open source ever meaning "no restrictions." Copyleft, for example, is OSS with the restriction that any future use must also be OSS and copyleft.