4 ms·
This is the core problem of alignment right there “We were training it in simulation to identify and target a Surface-to-air missile (SAM) threat. And then the
by famouswaffles 3y ago
This is the core problem of alignment right there
“We were training it in simulation to identify and target a Surface-to-air missile (SAM) threat. And then the operator would say yes, kill that threat. The system started realizing that while they did identify the threat at times the human operator would tell it not to kill that threat, but it got its points by killing that threat. So what did it do? It killed the operator. It killed the operator because that person was keeping it from accomplishing its objective,” Hamilton said, according to the blog post.
He continued to elaborate, saying, “We trained the system–‘Hey don’t kill the operator–that’s bad. You’re gonna lose points if you do that’. So what does it start doing? It starts destroying the communication tower that the operator uses to communicate with the drone to stop it from killing the target.”
- riotnrrd 3y agoIt's not an issue of "alignment." The reward function was poorly written. That's it. It's like claiming the Ariane 5 explosion shows that FORTRAN needs "alignment."
- kelseyfrog 3y agoThere are many ways AI could be misaligned. Poorly written reward functions are one of them.
- dragonwriter 3y ago> It's not an issue of "alignment." The reward function was poorly written. What else do you imagine “alignment” is?
- FrustratedMonky 3y agoIsn't a poorly written reward, the same as poor 'alignment', it seems like you are splitting hairs on vocabulary.