4 ms·
The claim is that allowing corner-crossing would cause the ranch to lose 25% of its value, and the ranch is currently valued at $31.1 million. Details: https://
by kens 3y ago
The claim is that allowing corner-crossing would cause the ranch to lose 25% of its value, and the ranch is currently valued at $31.1 million. Details: https://www.gillettenewsrecord.com/news/wyoming/article_a5197326-df94-53ce-82bd-e640acd1929d.html https://www.gillettenewsrecord.com/news/wyoming/article_a519...
(I'm not justifying this claim, of course, just providing information in case anyone was wondering where the number came from.)
- wkat4242 3y agoBut if corner crossing is legal that value was never accurate in the first place. It can't be considered 'lost'. This is really some pretty contrived reasoning.
- HDThoreaun 3y agoThere's some precedent saying corner crossing is not legal. The owner almost certainly bought the property with that in mind.
- kjs3 3y agoTo be less charitable, the owner almost certainly bought the property thinking he could use his billions to bully people into not crossing the corner, allowing him to use not only the property he bought, but also the property that belongs to the people as his personal back yard.