4 ms·
Evidence to support my claim that Zuckerberg has destroyed trust include Cambridge Analytica and the pixel trackers that scraped health data without consent. S
by scrum-treats 3y ago
Evidence to support my claim that Zuckerberg has destroyed trust include Cambridge Analytica and the pixel trackers that scraped health data without consent.
See how easy that is. Now your turn. Oh that's right. No data, still...
Your claim that the users don't care is baseless.
> Let us test this right now: Go to Zuckerberg’s Facebook or Instagram page and tell him to shut Facebook and all of Meta’s services down like you said in your comment.
Your suggestion for a "test" is to log into facebook and/or instagram and communicate with an account that Zuckerberg does not use to express your sentiment. This is the most ignorant approach I've read on communication.
> I guarantee you, not only you will not do it, but even if you did, it will only prove that the users will NOT care regardless and all this shows is that you are all talk on this website whilst you complaining about shutting down Meta.
I guarantee that you are not intelligent. You are a puppet. Suggestion is to pull out the hand lodged inside you, in hopes you can reclaim your mental capacity.
- antiviral 3y agoThis is Axios' 2023 poll of the top 100 brands: https://www.axios.com/2023/05/23/corporate-brands-reputation-america https://www.axios.com/2023/05/23/corporate-brands-reputation... The 96th trusted brand out of 100 is Meta, just above Fox, FTX, and the Trump organization.
- rvz 3y ago> Evidence to support my claim that Zuckerberg has destroyed trust include Cambridge Analytica and the pixel trackers that scraped health data without consent. Yet the number of users using their services is still in the billions of users even since Cambridge Analytica according to Meta's own numbers [0] and as shown in historical numbers on Statista [1], rising to a total to 3 billion daily active users across all their services. So, for the fourth time: The users do. not. care. > Your suggestion for a "test" is to log into facebook and/or instagram and communicate with an account that Zuckerberg does not use to express your sentiment. This is the most ignorant approach I've read on communication. So when are you going to 'seriously' tell Zuckerberg and Meta to shut all their services down then if you won't tell him on his page(s), assuming you are 'serious'? It's fine to back out of what you said earlier about shutting it down: >> How about Meta pulls itself out of social media altogether. Zuckerberg has destroyed all trust at this point. Shut it down. Seriously. > I guarantee that you are not intelligent. You are a puppet. Suggestion is to pull out the hand lodged inside you, in hopes you can reclaim your mental capacity. That is more of a reflection on yourself in denial especially with your first comment. But as expected unsurprisingly, you are full of talk on this website. For someone like you to tell Meta and Zuckerberg to seriously consider shutting down all their services with billions of users still using their services is someone who has already shown that they aren't remotely serious. [0] https://investor.fb.com/investor-news/press-release-details/2023/Meta-Reports-First-Quarter-2023-Results/default.aspx https://investor.fb.com/investor-news/press-release-details/... [1] https://www.statista.com/statistics/1092227/facebook-product-dau https://www.statista.com/statistics/1092227/facebook-product...
- scrum-treats 3y agoShhhh... It's time for you to learn now.
- rvz 3y agoSo you still have nothing left to say about telling Zuckerberg and Meta to shut their services down since you know you won't do it? Just admit you weren't serious about what you said and you were just being a sock-puppet. Again, Meta's services is still up and running with its billions of users still on the platform whilst you continue to sit there complaining about shutting it down. You are all talk.
- scrum-treats 3y ago> So you still have nothing left to say about telling Zuckerberg and Meta to shut their services down since you know you won't do it? Just admit you weren't serious about what you said and you were just being a sock-puppet. This is a very passive-aggressive assertion. I ask that you respect both me and yourself by limiting this type of communication style. It's not productive, and shows you are searching for power, because you don't have any. > Again, Meta's services is still up and running with its billions of users still on the platform whilst you continue to sit there complaining about shutting it down. You are all talk. Good things take time. Share your FB and Instagram handle. I'll keep you informed on the progress.
- rvz 3y ago> This is a very passive-aggressive assertion. I ask that you respect both me and yourself by limiting this type of communication style. It's not productive, and shows you are searching for power, because you don't have any. You're the one who claims to care enough to tell Zuckerberg to 'seriously' shut Meta down, yet you knew you weren't being serious in the first place in actually getting him to do it. You talk about 'respect' after you first threw insults like 'I guarantee that you are not intelligent', 'You are a puppet.', etc. yet you're here calling for productive communication? You are not 'serious'. > Good things take time. Share your FB and Instagram handle. I'll keep you informed on the progress. I neither use Facebook or Instagram. My point is, even if you tell both Zuckerberg and Meta on their FB and IG pages to consider shutting their services down in a comment, it will only prove my point that for the fifth time the billions of Meta users around the world simply do. not. care. about your post regardless. So unless you have pasted a direct link here commenting with your FB/IG account on Meta, and Zuckerberg's FB and IG pages about considering to shut themselves down, you were only fooling around and just complaining about it here, since you won't do anything about it.