4 ms·
But the issue is that it's not "who can pollute for the social good?". It's "Who's been doing some serious illegal dumping?". In almost all of these cases - t
by horsawlarway 3y ago
But the issue is that it's not "who can pollute for the social good?".
It's "Who's been doing some serious illegal dumping?".
In almost all of these cases - the issue is NOT that the company simply didn't know what was going to happen (although in many cases this is where they started).
It's that the company hid facts, lied, manipulated the public, and in general attempted to squash any and all evidence that might hurt their profits.
The first is acceptable. The second should be met with termination (as in - the companies that do this should have leadership removed: anything from jail time to nationalization).