2 ms·
> Not only is it materially bad, a lot of society's trust is burned. Too much rule adherence, resulting in too much trust can also have undesirable consequence
by noizejoy 3y ago
> Not only is it materially bad, a lot of society's trust is burned.
Too much rule adherence, resulting in too much trust can also have undesirable consequences, e.g.
From "Traffic safety and norms of compliance with rules:An exploratory study"[0]:
"We use a simple model of drivers’ vigilance effort choice to show that drivers’ propensity to follow traffic rules has two opposite effects on road safety. On the one hand, it lowers the frequency of dangerous situations. On the other hand, it also reduces drivers’ vigilance effort as each driver anticipates that dangerous situations will be less frequent. These two opposite effects may lead to a non-monotonic relationship between compliance with road rules and the incidence of road traffic accidents. We present cross-country estimates that support the existence of a bell-shaped relationship between norms of compliance with rules and traffic fatalities." [0]
[0] https://defipp.unamur.be/wp/defipp_wp_2021_3.pdf https://defipp.unamur.be/wp/defipp_wp_2021_3.pdf
- gretch 3y agoI do not buy this paper's conclusion. First problem I see is that they use Road Fatalities as proxy metric for overall goodness. If someone's driving drunk, and they run their truck into your living room at 2am - yeah maybe no one died, but a lot of damage and stress was caused. Not to mention just destruction in the form of minor accidents. I simply cannot buy the conclusion - "Yeah it's a good thing we have a few drunk drivers". Call me anti science if you must