>The entire service is reliant on the ability of users to "pin" copyrighted images from across the web. I'm not so sure. The service is reliant on the ability

>The entire service is reliant on the ability of users to "pin" copyrighted images from across the web. I'm not so sure. The service is reliant on the ability of its users to "pin" content which, from what I can tell, is represented by images. I could be wrong, though. >Anyone with any objectivity can see that 99% of the images on Pinterest are being used without permission. However, it was "pinned" by its users, not the site administrators, so I believe it would qualify the same way imgur qualifies despite it being a massive pool of copyright infringement. But IANAL.