3 ms·
Some of those shots to me come across as if the character's glance just happens to be where the camera is. It increases the realism to me. Even if intentional
by derbOac 3y ago
Some of those shots to me come across as if the character's glance just happens to be where the camera is. It increases the realism to me.
Even if intentional on the part of the director or actor, there's a bias I think people have to assume something like "all glances at me are because of me". As in, if the events of The Shining were happening, without a camera, surely Torrance would look at the spot the camera happens to be. Or, alternatively, if he never looked in the location of the camera it might be interpretable as avoidance.
I think there's more to it than that (subconsciously drawing you into the diagesis?) but that's how I've interpreted some scenes.
- paulrpotts 3y agoNicholson's eyes don't just graze the camera or sweep past it - he's clearly been directed to pause (even for a tiny moment) looking directly at the lens. It's the opposite of what film actors are trained to do, which is avoid looking directly at the lens. In a typical dramatic film a shot where an actor looked directly at the lens would be a ruined take.