> I am not much of a Zig-head, but the best compromise I can think of is having a few operators which purely and solely exist for this purpose. In other words,

> I am not much of a Zig-head, but the best compromise I can think of is having a few operators which purely and solely exist for this purpose. In other words, there is no operator overloading, but you can define, say, "#+" for any two structs, or something like that. And those operators wouldn't have any precedence. > If you want to take this one step further you'd probably have to allow users to define infix functions, which would be its own can of worms. As long as these infix function are preceded by a recognizable operator ("#" in your example), I think that this would be fine.