4 ms·
Lookup Brandolini's law IMHO generative AI is an automated way of generating bullshit, which is fine as long as the data used for training is not bs itself you
by x86x87 3y ago
Lookup Brandolini's law
IMHO generative AI is an automated way of generating bullshit, which is fine as long as the data used for training is not bs itself you can probably derive some value in a limited set of contexts. Once you have the BS make it into the wild and it is fed back into the generator we will enter a BS downspiral.
If you're old enough to remember the world before search engines and how awesome search engines were in the beginning you've already seen this in action. Try using a search engine today. SEO spam made them almost unusable with really bad results.
This is the future of generative "AI". Show it work really really well for a small set of cases, get the imagination going and you're going heads first into a situation involving and emperor and lack of clothes.
The AI hype is also not new. !e've had several cycles of "thinking machines" taking over. I don't see how this time it's different.
It's always something that gets hyped up and gets the hustlers going: vr, ml, selfdriving, crypto, llms. Look at the tech and how it works, use it, ignore the hype.
- wing-_-nuts 3y agoThis comment has absolutely nothing to do with the article posted.
- flangola7 3y ago>Once you have the BS make it into the wild and it is fed back into the generator we will enter a BS downspiral. This is already shown to not be an issue in research from the past year. It is possible to synthesize high quality data that still provides benefit when subsequently trained on. It makes sense when you remember that this is what organic intelligence was doing all along.