> Now lets substitute that into the editorialized title "US banks no longer possessed or retained $472B in deposits in the Q1 2023" From that same link, let's

> Now lets substitute that into the editorialized title "US banks no longer possessed or retained $472B in deposits in the Q1 2023" From that same link, let's do the same thing with the other definitions of lost: "US banks can no longer find $472B in deposits in the Q1 2023" "US banks $472B in deposits have gone astray in the Q1 2023" It's not clear without reading the article and, given that the other definitions are FAR more newsworthy, it's an important distinction.