If you're going to refuse to use common definitions and usages for words, even when used within appropriate context, I don't really know what to do with a compl

If you're going to refuse to use common definitions and usages for words, even when used within appropriate context, I don't really know what to do with a completely different reality Lets go with dictionary.com https://www.dictionary.com/browse/lost https://www.dictionary.com/browse/lost > no longer possessed or retained: Now lets substitute that into the editorialized title "US banks no longer possessed or retained $472B in deposits in the Q1 2023" Wow, it still makes sense. Lets go to the FDIC now. https://www.fdic.gov/bank/historical/crisis/chap6.pdf https://www.fdic.gov/bank/historical/crisis/chap6.pdf > On the other hand, the bank’s franchise value (if any) is lost > For example, some assets might have lost value because asset management > In addition to the fees, loan servicing transfers may impose indirect costs, such as lost information or delays or miscommunications in addressing delinquencies. > A senior tranche is the least risky tranche in a securitization and takes losses only when all the other tranches have lost their full value. It doesn't seem like the FDIC has any issue with using the word "lost" in the context of "numbers went down"