> Now, that's not a simple fact. A simple fact is that China still didn't commit to the project. Large scale projects take time to negotiate, the fact that you'

> Now, that's not a simple fact. A simple fact is that China still didn't commit to the project. Large scale projects take time to negotiate, the fact that you're desperate to make something more out of it says volumes. > Don't you think that the price is an important part here? If Russia "offloads" its resources at prices near break even, then the whole situation is a strategic loss. Except they're not selling at break even prices, this is just the fairy tale you keep repeating here. > Even the poor data we have points to Russia being the bigger loser. It doesn't show anything of the sort as numerous articles I've provided clearly state. However, you're clearly just going to repeat this like a broken record so I don't see any point continuing this discussion. We'll see who's right soon enough.