Thank you, Promising work! Question: How was zstd built in the tests? In other words, was the possibility of 2-stage pgo+lto optimization taken into account?

Thank you, Promising work! Question: How was zstd built in the tests? In other words, was the possibility of 2-stage pgo+lto optimization taken into account? (the alpine zstd claim ~ "+30% faster on x86_64 than the default makefile" [1] ) [1] "" # 2-stage pgo+lto build (non-bootstrap), standard meson usage. # note that with clang, # llvm-profdata merge --output=output/somefilename(?) output/.profraw # is needed. # believe it or not, this is +30% faster on x86_64 than the default makefile build (same params).. # maybe needs more testing # shellcheck disable=2046 ""* https://github.com/alpinelinux/aports/blob/master/main/zstd/APKBUILD https://github.com/alpinelinux/aports/blob/master/main/zstd/...