>They bought it with the liabilities, so suggesting Amazon isn’t responsible for those liabilities now is preposterous. This is a fair take but I would argue t

>They bought it with the liabilities, so suggesting Amazon isn’t responsible for those liabilities now is preposterous. This is a fair take but I would argue that Amazon shouldn't be anymore liable the ring would be if it was never acquired. What I mean is amazon shouldn't be on the hook for more in fines just because the greater business made 3.2B in profit. I can't believe I am actually defending Amazon here, but I am trying to look at it objectively.