3 ms·
But what size is that screen? That’s the problem. Screen sizes have increased (or rather: it’s now affordable to buy a larger screen). A 27 inch panel with you
by ugh 15y ago
But what size is that screen? That’s the problem.
Screen sizes have increased (or rather: it’s now affordable to buy a larger screen). A 27 inch panel with your resolution has the same old and boring ppi like a 17 inch screen with 1600x900 pixels.
The screens Apple seems to want to build into their Macs would double that ppi count. That’s what would be great.
- wmf 15y agoA smaller, higher-DPI monitor displays less information; all those extra pixels just make things sharper. Sure, I'd like a sharper screen but I'm not giving up real estate for it. If Apple comes out with a 30" retina display I'll be all over it, but I know they won't.
- jacques_chester 15y agoI'd be happy with higher-res 23" monitors, because I like to use them in a portrait orientation.
- ugh 15y agoHuh? That makes no sense. People don’t pick small displays over large displays just because. They pick them because they make for an attractive package. It’s all tradeoff, don’t you understand?