Thanks! Exactly, most people only know the prevention side of SBS (which is obviously critically important) and not the controversial side. It is uncontested t

Thanks! Exactly, most people only know the prevention side of SBS (which is obviously critically important) and not the controversial side. It is uncontested that one should never shake a baby, which can cause lasting damage. What is contested is whether you can reliably infer that shaking occurred solely by observing a couple of supposedly specific intracranial lesions (subdural and retinal hemorrhage, bridging vein thrombosis) when you can't find any other plausible explanation.