1) You are essentially then just saying "Twitter's policies are, in fact, not about freedom of speech, as there is a policy--that you feel was correctly enforce

1) You are essentially then just saying "Twitter's policies are, in fact, not about freedom of speech, as there is a policy--that you feel was correctly enforced--which somewhat obviously conflicts with that entire concept". 2) If the actual policies are back in play for this discussion--rather than the entirely-not-the-case thing about freedom of speech being upheld without a freedom of reach--then I recommend you read them as they definitely cover the content being cited in this article. https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-policies/twitter-rules https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-policies/twitter-rules (But like, the article also directly quotes the policy and juxtaposes it with the problematic content... which is also what you are doing to defend yourself against me trying to show that your own claim is false... so I hope you can see that your position is internally inconsistent?)