3 ms·
>>It's also like bragging that you were a highly advanced civilization and got conquered/occupied by a bunch of dumb savages. They explain that part by using t
by kamaal 3y ago
>>It's also like bragging that you were a highly advanced civilization and got conquered/occupied by a bunch of dumb savages.
They explain that part by using the idea of 'traitors'. They are often the minorities of that land(whom they currently hate, and serve as a nice punching bag in the whole process, and in the overall scheme of hate process).
The 'traitor' part is like a constant theme in these stories. Super advanced ancestors, but also very nice, accommodating to everyone. Some savages from the outside invade, traitors help them from inside. Savages win, they are colonised. Traitors benefit. The monuments, symbols and anything to do with the traitors is now demonised and the 'treason' is used as a casus belli for a genocide/ethnic cleansing.
- renewiltord 3y agoQuite similar, in that respect, to the Vietnam War. The "We would have won if it weren't for the people back home who stopped us from fighting" stance, for instance.
- nickcotter 3y agoIt’s a popular gambit in various guises: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stab-in-the-back_myth https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stab-in-the-back_myth