> So much trust involved in a possibly nuclear-level scenario, and you're not curious at all how that trust was built up? Such as by sharing intelligence? Beca

> So much trust involved in a possibly nuclear-level scenario, and you're not curious at all how that trust was built up? Such as by sharing intelligence? Because they don't spy on each other and they share intelligence gathered elsewhere, as the agreement says. Why would you jump to the conclusion that this quote means they help each other break their respective countries' laws despite complete lack of evidence?