3 ms·
That’s not the same as giving the model to someone and allowing them to build tools with AI powering it, or the development of alternative models (which is what
by fnordpiglet 3y ago
That’s not the same as giving the model to someone and allowing them to build tools with AI powering it, or the development of alternative models (which is what they’re trying to stifle). It’s less about transparency and more about putting the tools in as many hands as possible
- samstave 3y agoIts funny, this is the second time in a few days I came across your /u/ and comments. THIS WAS COMMENTED IN RED OR GREEN Anyway, yeah I think models need a way to self-register upon whom uses them.. yes Creepy AF, but also needed AF. ? disagree>??
- fnordpiglet 3y agoNo, I think these models should be treated for what they are - a bunch of numbers. It’s like trying to treat encryption as special. It’s just code. There may be some specific applications that require regulation or control. That’s ok. But the underlying fundamental technologies should be open and free.
- samstave 3y agojust a question, did you get my RED/GREEN comment?