> When we improve LLMs, won't they just be a fancier auto-complete? Not necessarily, and if so, only if your first postulate is true. Which is really difficult

> When we improve LLMs, won't they just be a fancier auto-complete? Not necessarily, and if so, only if your first postulate is true. Which is really difficult to say because "fancy auto-complete" is too vague to argue. Human speech can also be described as fancy auto-complete. Luckily we don't have to argue that because I specifically am saying it doesn't have to be LLMs. You've missed the point entirely.