3 ms·
You could definitely do that now using many techniques, that would cost under $50, up to building your own RLHF for the socratic method. If this is something yo
by nerpderp82 3y ago
You could definitely do that now using many techniques, that would cost under $50, up to building your own RLHF for the socratic method. If this is something you and interested in and want, I would highly suggest pursuing. I use it for exploring and learning subjects all day long. With a couple of external tools, it would be 10x better and would enable less skilled users to get value out of it.
You don't know what you don't know after all.
- sebzim4500 3y agoHonestly I don't think that GPT-4 is smart enough to be a useful tutor for anything beyond highschool maths, no matter how much finetuning/RLHF you do. I can see it being great for humanities though if you can get the hallucination rate down.
- visarga 3y agoFunny, nobody thinks GPT-4 is quite there in their own field, but can readily agree it might be good enough in other fields.
- sebzim4500 3y agoI don't think that's true, I'm a software engineer and I am wiling to admit that GPT-4 is useful for generating/refactoring code. If only I was allowed to use it for work :( It is not useful for working with maths proofs, except maybe if you are bad a latex.
- nerpderp82 3y agoThat is kinda true, it isn't an expert in anyone field, it is something of a intermediate in all fields. It will offer the most assistance outside of your domain of expertise. In your domain of expertise, it can provide a sanity check and another set of eyes.