Thanks for the clarification, though I do have to emphasize that a lot of Rust adopters are those who are adopting it as a replacement for a systems language, a

Thanks for the clarification, though I do have to emphasize that a lot of Rust adopters are those who are adopting it as a replacement for a systems language, and saying you're switching from Rust to working on LLMs is a bit of a non-sequitur and not an actual choice for a lot of people who use Rust. I think the reality is though that you can’t really get away from dysfunctional organization even falling back on other languages (or maybe you prefer the C++ flavor of organizational dysfunction), but I do think with Rust you see it a lot more in the public eye.