3 ms·
JMAP is completely unsuitable for server–server message delivery. JMAP is an object synchronisation protocol for working with persistent, per-user resources. No
by chrismorgan 3y ago
JMAP is completely unsuitable for server–server message delivery. JMAP is an object synchronisation protocol for working with persistent, per-user resources. None of that is in the slightest bit useful for server–server message delivery: there is no user account, and there are no persistent objects—what you need is purely fire-and-forget. Your scoffing suggests that you haven’t understood what JMAP is.
- kazinator 3y ago> JMAP is completely unsuitable for server–server message delivery That is obvious; but the scum who want to disrupt and destroy e-mail won't stop there. Of course, big, monolithic mail companies would love to get people off the old protocols. Once that is in place, they will make deals to move mail among themselves in some new ways, and e-mail as you know it is finished. > Your scoffing suggests that you haven’t understood what JMAP is. I'm not assuming you or anyone else in this thread is an idiot; please return the favor. (I am assuming that you're naive ... sorry about that.)
- chrismorgan 3y agoI’m perplexed that you seem to think JMAP is connected with any efforts to disrupt or destroy email. It’s completely the opposite. It’s been developed by people deeply involved in the email space and heavily invested in email being good and useful, mostly people who make their living from providing email services. Seriously, a lot of what you’re saying just doesn’t make sense and is internally inconsistent.