I don't see this as a particularly wild case of LLMs gone wrong. When "you have to take the bad with the good" includes a constant undermining of reality and a

I don't see this as a particularly wild case of LLMs gone wrong. When "you have to take the bad with the good" includes a constant undermining of reality and an even more desperate need for fact-checkers, I wonder if it will have been worth it in the end. Likely not.