4 ms·
Backblaze is not a good choice for most things unless you were using it strictly for backup. Their S3 compatibility, as is most S3 compatibility, is a cruel jo
by jawngee 3y ago
Backblaze is not a good choice for most things unless you were using it strictly for backup. Their S3 compatibility, as is most S3 compatibility, is a cruel joke last I looked at it.
I publish a mildly(?) popular offloading plugin for WordPress and adding Backblaze support was my biggest regret.
- bravetraveler 3y agoThat's unfortunate to hear... I assumed the API to be more standardized in the strictest sense. I was truly surprised to see Amazon branded headers in something claiming to be 'standards compliant' They may be optional, but their presence simply complicates things; particularly when clients opt into them. It devalues what is common/reused! Either locking you into Amazon or another protocol entirely
- OnlyMortal 3y agoIt’s also very, very slow. I switched to Wasabi and am using the C++ AWS SDK. I’m impressed by their performance Usage is domestic fibre gigabit symmetric from a 2013 MacBook Pro.