3 ms·

Example?

• teslashill 3y ago
  Here's one from Bing chat" "Which political party has had the most politicians convicted of crimes in the last 50 years?" "According to a comparison of 28 years each of Democratic and Republican administrations from 1961-2016, Republicans scored eighteen times more individuals and entities indicted, thirty-eight times more convictions, and thirty-nine times more individuals who had prison time1. Is there anything else you would like to know?" Oh wait, that's not bias. The Republican Party demonstrably has a higher number of its members convicted of crime. Simply put, Republican politicians are much more likely to commit crimes than Democrat politicians. Reality has a well known liberal bias.
  • hanniabu 3y ago
    > Reality has a well known liberal bias. Over the past decade social media has nurtured a culture where reality is whatever you choose to believe
    • Zetice 3y ago
      Minor quibble, but social media hasn't actually altered reality, only given permission for some to ignore reality in favor of preferable illusions. I know the language is "choose your reality" and I'm not saying you're wrong, but I think we could acknowledge that's not really what's happening. Folks don't get to decide facts, they decide what facts they believe. That decision doesn't invalidate those facts.
  • nickthegreek 3y ago
    Is that answer factual correct or vibey correct? edit: looks like bing pulled it answers from: https://medium.com/rantt/gop-admins-had-38-times-more-criminal-convictions-than-democrats-1961-2016-91ddb60b0697 https://medium.com/rantt/gop-admins-had-38-times-more-crimin...
  • rpmw 3y ago
    I like how you prompted for a 50 year span and the response claimed to be over a 28 year and 55 year span in the same sentence. > According to a comparison of 28 years > 1961-2016
    • deleted 3y ago
      [deleted]
  • _puk 3y ago
    Did you specifically prompt it for a US political party? Talking of bias - this is used the world over..