2 ms·
No, the injured party (the woman denied boarding, the daughter, and thus, denied the ability to testify) was a US citizen. It's right there in the quote pulled
by deathanatos 3y ago
No, the injured party (the woman denied boarding, the daughter, and thus, denied the ability to testify) was a US citizen. It's right there in the quote pulled from the legal doc.
(IIRC, the mother was also on the no-fly list, and that was context of the case itself, even. One could rightly also refer to her as an injured party too.)
- lern_too_spel 3y agoI had read the first document, which was about her mother, who isn't a US citizen and wasn't in the US.
- deathanatos 3y agoThe quote is from the first document. Again, yes, the mother isn't a US citizen, she's not the focus of my comment, the daughter is. The daughter is a US citizen, and she is additionally mentioned in the document.
- lern_too_spel 3y agoThe daughter immediately received remedy from the court. The mother did not despite her far more severe injuries because, as you now admit, she was a nonimmigrant alien outside the US.