3 ms·
Because they take control away from the actual owners of devices, and they, unnecessarily contribute to e-waste, for no increase in real security.
by josephcsible 3y ago
Because they take control away from the actual owners of devices, and they, unnecessarily contribute to e-waste, for no increase in real security.
- JohnFen 3y ago> they take control away from the actual owners of devices Only if they're used that way. They don't take control away from the actual owners of the devices if its the owners who put them in there, for instance. Again, I think you're conflating the existence of a mechanism with the abuse of the mechanism. If you were just railing against the abusive uses, I'd be behind you 100%. I just don't see why we should outlaw a common and useful mechanism entirely, rather than outlaw certain uses of that mechanism.