> Your personality, culture and appearance are the main components of how people perceive you, your identity I'm not sure if this is bad rhetoric (defining ide

> Your personality, culture and appearance are the main components of how people perceive you, your identity I'm not sure if this is bad rhetoric (defining identity as how you are perceived rather than who you are) or if you really think of your own identity as the judgements that random people make about you based on who knows what. Either way, please rethink. > Your personality, culture and appearance are the main components of how people perceive you, your identity Ah, so if you asked for 100 numbers between 1-100, there's no reason not to expect 100 numbers very close to 50? > Why do you think that every sample has to be implicitly representative of the US population? That is a straw man that I am not suggesting. I am suggesting that there should be some variation. It doesn't have to represent the US population, but can you really think of ANY context where a sample of 100 families turns up every single one having one male and one female parent, who are still married and alive? You're bringing a culture war mindset to a discussion about implicit bias in AI. It's not super constructive.