> You can't argue whether the data is correct or not without gathering it yourself, and you can't gather it yourself. You actually can argue about the data bei

> You can't argue whether the data is correct or not without gathering it yourself, and you can't gather it yourself. You actually can argue about the data being "correct". The way to do is, is studies need to be much more radically open with their raw data sources. In AI, that would mean actually releasing the code you used, so people can try it themselves. Or, in more sociology stuff, where you are doing, I don't know, interviews with humans, you could release the physical videos of your interviews. And then for science stuff, show pictures/vidoes of the science you are doing. I'm sure there would still be way to hack this. But significant more code and data transparency would do a huge amount for allowing other people to replicate or verify your work.