3 ms·
But for it to be a pretext or pretense for the restrictions, the powerful would have to benefit in some way from the rest of the folks abiding by those restrict
by DiggyJohnson 3y ago
But for it to be a pretext or pretense for the restrictions, the powerful would have to benefit in some way from the rest of the folks abiding by those restrictions. I don't think the world got more enjoyable for the rich just because the rest of us were hunkering down. They might have not played by the same rules, but the didn't get an outsized benefit - only less encumbered.
- whimsicalism 3y agoIf everyone else is hunkering down while they traipse around, then they have less of a chance of getting infected by the rabble.
- carlosjobim 3y agoPower over other people in itself is the ultimate pleasure for the powerful people of the world.
- VagueMag 3y agoThe wealthy and powerful have read their Marx, and understand that for them to maintain their station requires that the vast majority of humanity be pressed into ever-worsening material conditions. What better way to get everyone to accept a lower standard of living, worse education for their children, and amped up surveillance and restrictions on their movements, than to sell it as a pandemic response that's all "for their own good"? The part where they forced huge swaths of small/medium sized firms out of business and consolidated their market share for huge corporations was just a bonus. "Capital's profitability now depends on 'lockdowns', acute social enclosure, and 'medical' tyranny": https://grossmanite.wixsite.com/my-site/post/capital-s-profitability-now-depends-on-lockdowns-acute-social-enclosure-and-medical-tyranny https://grossmanite.wixsite.com/my-site/post/capital-s-profi...
- Nasrudith 3y agoNobody but Marxists read him and take him seriously. Their theory of mind are all universally godawful in that they expect everyone richer than them to think like a cross between a mustache twirling villain using their twisted and stunted vocabularies.