3 ms·
As has already been discussed in numerous places, Google, Facebook, Amazon and even Microsoft have broken P3P implementations in several places. That's hardly
by azylman 15y ago
As has already been discussed in numerous places, Google, Facebook, Amazon and even Microsoft have broken P3P implementations in several places.
That's hardly "shady warez sites". I love you you jumped straight to that conclusion, though. Shows your biases coming through...
- cooldeal 15y agoBroken implementations are different from intentionally subverted ones. If FB is doing this, they deserve blame too. The argument I was responding to seems to be that P3P is a gentleman's agreement and thus is doomed to fail. However, I expect more from Google than I would from random sites on the internet. So Google flouting a gentleman's agreement is very different from a warez site doing it. After all, you don't expect Google to read your mail in Gmail versus the site admins of warez-mail.com reading your email. Or do you?
- eli 15y agoBut it's a gentleman's agreement between Microsoft and... no one. The user didn't ask to have their cookies blocked and Google certainly didn't ask to be a part of this scheme. It's not really an agreement when only one party has agreed to it.