> The reason I mention this is because there can be no unbiased, impartial arbiter. No human or subsequent entities spawned of human intellect could ever be tra

> The reason I mention this is because there can be no unbiased, impartial arbiter. No human or subsequent entities spawned of human intellect could ever be transcendentally objective. So why pretend to be? I apologize for lacking clarity in my prior response, which addressed this specific point. There is no way to achieve all versions of "unbiased" -- under different (but both logical and reasonable) definitions of biased, every metric will fail. That reminds me -- I wonder if there is a paper already addressing this, analogous to Arrow's impossibility theorem for voting...