I would instead recommend Josh's version as it covers more events with more context https://hackmd.io/p3VG_bK9TXOvtgh1oA2yZQ?view https://hackmd.io/p3VG_bK9TXO

I would instead recommend Josh's version as it covers more events with more context https://hackmd.io/p3VG_bK9TXOvtgh1oA2yZQ?view https://hackmd.io/p3VG_bK9TXOvtgh1oA2yZQ?view I found JT's version lacked some context (e.g. that the 5 people wasn't even half of the whole group) that I think is important for understanding what went on. I misunderstood from their post and I'm fairly familiar with the structure of the Rust organization. disclaimer: I am on the same Rust team as Josh and have some interactions with JT and have respect for both. Granted, I think there are several pieces of context missing for understanding the situation, like when ThePhD asked for reassurances, did that stop at their point of contact or go back to the whole group and had the dissenting voices spoken up before then? Who all knew how cautious ThePhD was being in communicating the experimental nature of their work?