> The thing is that if you are not an expert in the field you cannot tell gibberish from legit facts. Some answers are more easily verifiable than other. If I

> The thing is that if you are not an expert in the field you cannot tell gibberish from legit facts. Some answers are more easily verifiable than other. If I ask about an explanation of quantum mechanics, I might check if the names of particles and equations are correct (which they probably will be), but verifying the overall reasoning is basically the same as knowing the subject in the first place. But if I ask 'tell me the 5 most important neutrino experiments performed at the LHC and their outcomes', I can relatively easily check the results by finding the papers, their citation numbers, and reading the abstracts - I don't need to understand every detail. Maybe it will have missed one that should have been on the list, much like a manual search could have, but I won't fall for an outright hallucination. And if I ask about, oh I don't know, let's say to find some precedents for a case I'm working on, it's straightforward to take the case names that the LLM spat out, look for them in a legal database, and see if the judge actually ruled what the LLM claimed he had.