I tried to replicate a few of my chats (the displayed date is incorrect, it seems to be the publish date instead of the original chat date): svg editor: early

I tried to replicate a few of my chats (the displayed date is incorrect, it seems to be the publish date instead of the original chat date): svg editor: early april: https://chat.openai.com/share/c235b48e-5a0e-4a89-af1c-0a3e7c6e4c5a https://chat.openai.com/share/c235b48e-5a0e-4a89-af1c-0a3e7c... now: https://chat.openai.com/share/e4362a56-4bc7-45dc-8d1b-5e3842161384 https://chat.openai.com/share/e4362a56-4bc7-45dc-8d1b-5e3842... originally it correctly inferred that I wanted a framework for svg editors, the latest version assumes I want a js framework (I tried several times) until I clarify. It also insists that the framework cannot do editable text until I nudge it in the right direction. Overall slightly worse but the code generated is still fine. word embeddings: early april: https://chat.openai.com/share/f6bde43a-2fce-47dc-b23c-cc5af3e47b58 https://chat.openai.com/share/f6bde43a-2fce-47dc-b23c-cc5af3... now: https://chat.openai.com/share/25c2703e-d89d-465c-9808-4df1b3eb40fa https://chat.openai.com/share/25c2703e-d89d-465c-9808-4df1b3... in the latest version it imported "from sklearn.preprocessing import normalize" without using it later. It also erroneously uses pytorch_cos_sim, which expects a pytorch tensor whereas we're putting in a numpy array. overall I think the quality has degraded slightly, but not by enough that I would stop using it. Still miles ahead of Bard imo.