> Ostensibly it's been written to crack down on the type of attention-grabbing climate protests we've seen recently with people blocking motorway traffic, disru

> Ostensibly it's been written to crack down on the type of attention-grabbing climate protests we've seen recently with people blocking motorway traffic, disrupting major public events etc., but the law contains some preposterously vague wording that should alarm anyone who cares about the right to protest in a democracy. Is the ostensible reason sufficient? Isn't that just as oppressive?