Thanks! I appreciate the perspective. > "can a reasonable person who knows how chargpt works look at a prompt, output and conclude part of the output at least

Thanks! I appreciate the perspective. > "can a reasonable person who knows how chargpt works look at a prompt, output and conclude part of the output at least was a mere processing of, as opposed to original content that was inspired by the copy righted content?" It would be funny if the "workaround" was to disallow very low "temperature" output, for some sort of "no, it's random, not just statistical!".