4 ms·
It's still fundamentally the same, hallucinates just the same, and anthropomorphizes itself as a confident, knowledgeable, intelligent being just the same. A n
by hospitalhusband 3y ago
It's still fundamentally the same, hallucinates just the same, and anthropomorphizes itself as a confident, knowledgeable, intelligent being just the same. A newer, better, faster, more capable car still isn't an airplane, even if it go fast enough to spend several seconds in the air.
- danielmarkbruce 3y agoSure, and 40 year olds have the same capabilities as 4 year olds, because "same architecture" or "fundamentally the same". And putting random weights inside the GPT-4 model architecture should behave "fundamentally the same" as the trained GPT-4 weights, because it's "same architecture". Forget this "training" stuff.
- hospitalhusband 3y agoIt's not a person, it's a machine. And it's one that will still produce hallucinations that embarrassingly prove that it has no notion of intelligence, and do so confidently. That it does so less than it's sibling is entirely irrelevant.
- danielmarkbruce 3y agoNope, wrong. The number of errors and the magnitude of each is very relevant.
- hospitalhusband 3y agoBlack box hallucination engines do what they do https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36134249 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36134249