The article actually talks about all of this and explains the why. Without repeating everything, the supreme court already makes this exception for cellphones d

The article actually talks about all of this and explains the why. Without repeating everything, the supreme court already makes this exception for cellphones domestically -as in police can search, let's say, a car but need warrant for the cellphone in the car. Makes sense to extend the same distinction to the border. That's all what the EFF is asking. But SC has refused to take it up.