3 ms·
I guess the point is GPT-4 hallucinates, too. Maybe it did well for this example but still a lawyer should not trust its output.
by selcuka 3y ago
I guess the point is GPT-4 hallucinates, too. Maybe it did well for this example but still a lawyer should not trust its output.
- BugsJustFindMe 3y agoMaybe, but it's surprisingly good in the face of all the non-version-indicating complaints about how terrible people think it is. Mostly I doubt that the lawyer was using GPT4, because the lawyer sounds like the kind of person who would be ignorant of the significance of the difference.
- jiggawatts 3y agoThe kind of person too lazy to check the output of a computer program before submitting it to a court of law is the type of person too cheap to pay $20 for the good version of the program. Think: Lionel Hutz.
- Smoosh 3y agoNo, checking was done! "Oops, I'd better remove that comma".