> I don't understand the apparent expectation that AI tools generated perfection, every time. The more interesting part of this for me is the degree to which t

> I don't understand the apparent expectation that AI tools generated perfection, every time. The more interesting part of this for me is the degree to which this intermediate conclusion has translated into: because it's not perfect now, it therefore cannot replace humans at doing X. In fact, I expect LLMs, etc. to improve at a breathtaking pace, and whatever nitpicking "turds" people find with them now, will be trivially fixed. I agree with your overall point that professionals will still be needed in some, perhaps changed, capacity for some time to come. But if you think your job, as it exists today, is safe because LLMs, etc. can't do it exactly perfectly right now, then there is probably a failure of imagination happening.