3 ms·
> Why is your default hypothesis that neural networks are analogous to human brains? Because that seems to be the only way to justify ip theft used for turning
by gumballindie 3y ago
> Why is your default hypothesis that neural networks are analogous to human brains?
Because that seems to be the only way to justify ip theft used for turning ml models into viable products. If this assumption is invalid then so is everything else - thus they push for it in a desperate attempt to productise other people’s work for free.
If ai would “think” and “learn” then surely they wouldn't need ever increasing amounts of data. Yet they do, because their premise is incorrect.
- horsawlarway 3y agoFrankly - this is a dumb comment (and I don't usually call things dumb, but this... it's dumb). > If ai would “think” and “learn” then surely they wouldn't need ever increasing amounts of data. Yet they do, because their premise is incorrect. If only people would "think" and "learn" and then surely they wouldn't need [education and basic input from the world]. Yet they do, because clearly people aren't thinking, learning creatures.... (fucking /s) Like - I'm struggling to even find a charitable way to read your comment...