Every specific example seems to have some sort of highly technical refutation that has been considered and rehearsed and will get debated in the comments endles

Every specific example seems to have some sort of highly technical refutation that has been considered and rehearsed and will get debated in the comments endlessly. But one thing that seems almost universally true is that there is an incredible amount of uncompensated and undercompensated labor behind every success in this domain. Which I see as simply a refinement of the overall model of capitalist advancement of technology. But it's very stark in this case, to the point where normal people are able to clearly intuit a wrong, even if they can't articulate it to the satisfaction of the advocates & beneficiaries.