3 ms·
> This item hasn't been started Open for a week. What's the matter, they're figuring out how to create a git branch? It's `git branch experimental && git push`
by nindalf 3y ago
> This item hasn't been started
Open for a week. What's the matter, they're figuring out how to create a git branch? It's `git branch experimental && git push`, and running that would have been quicker than creating this ticket.
I wish everyone who read this thread yesterday could have also seen this - a shining example of the capabilities of the clout chasers involved in this project. They've delivered on their promise of "no bureaucracy" by avoiding software development altogether. Genius.
- dijit 3y agoI think making a git branch which has auto-merging (but only if not conflicting with the upstream) is more time consuming than just making a branch at the current state. More likely this involves some kind of release engineering; anyone who has worked on large projects will tell you that it's not an effort to take lightly. Personally I feel like this fork is not really serious, but the issue might be that it either becomes serious or Rust's leadership will not change course. So, I'll give them the benefit of the doubt and quietly hope that I will never need to use crablang.