4 ms·
>> My colleague Spencer Kornhaber, writing about Ed Sheeran’s new album, surmised that its dull lyrics could’ve been composed by “a neural network trained on Sh
by hef19898 3y ago
>> My colleague Spencer Kornhaber, writing about Ed Sheeran’s new album, surmised that its dull lyrics could’ve been composed by “a neural network trained on Sheeran’s past work.”
Well, technically that is what happened? Besides the "artificial" bit of course.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- MadSudaca 3y agoMaybe he was just trying to communicate indirectly his dislike for the new album.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- quadrangle 3y agoThe comment you are replying to seems to be pointing out that Ed Sheeran himself, i.e. his own brain, is trained on the past work of Ed Sheeran. That's how I read it anyway.
- MadSudaca 3y agoYes, that's what I understood and why I said that maybe the author just doesn't like Ed Sheeran's music.
- hef19898 3y agoWell, Ed Sheeran self-trained himself, including positive feed-back on past work, on his own work. So in a sense, he still beats a Sheeran-bot! This no critique of Ed Sheerans work so, I actually do like his older albums. The last one didn't leave an impression so far to actually remember it.
- _rutinerad 3y agoI don’t listen to the radio/album versions of his songs since I think they are a bit dull, but I thought his Tiny Desk concert was great.
- mcculley 3y agoIt seems pretty obvious to me that whoever wrote that sentence did not like the album and was trying ineffectively to communicate.
- wzdd 3y agoThe lyrics were in fact composed by a neural network (Sheeran) trained on Sheeran's past work, all Sheeran's life experiences up to that point, and any new things that he had experienced since releasing his penultimate album. The colleague instead is sarcastically implying that, because they are dull, the lyrics sound like they were produced by a network exclusively trained on previous lyrics. Such a network would not be able to produce any content that was not simply a transformation of previous lyrics.
- chimeracoder 3y ago> The lyrics were in fact composed by a neural network (Sheeran) trained on Sheeran's past work The use of the term "neural network" to refer to artificial intelligence is an interesting and perhaps successful marketing term, but it's not really correct to say that Sheeran's actual works are composed by a "neural network" in the same sense that any computational product is. It's a collision of terminology. In computing, neural networks are at best a model for cerebral computation - and even then, they're an incredibly crude model, as any neuroscientist will tell you that cognition works very differently from LLMs. Even when they arrive at similar outcomes, the paths they take to get there are radically different.
- chaxor 3y agoThey are indeed radically different: one is very well understood in terms of how it works, and the other - neuroscientists have absolutely no idea how it works.